The iPhone 16e is Apple’s new entry-level phone model. Launched at the end of February with the idea of being the brand’s cheapest smartphone, the iPhone 16e has specifications very similar to those of the iPhone 16, thus becoming a question among consumers who see the launch as an opportunity to get into the iOS system.
So, what are the main differences between the models? Is the cheaper model worth it? Or is it better to pay a little more for the main model?
Check out the differences between the models below and determine which one is worth it.
iPhone 16e vs iPhone 16: What are the differences?
Starting with the structure of the devices, the lack of camera control is noticeable at launch, a feature that was new at the launch of the 16 lines.
Another clear difference between the smartphones is the presence of only one camera in the newest model, a 48 MP camera, while the iPhone 16 has a 2x telephoto lens.
The new iPhone also lacks the MagSafe wireless charging system.
iPhone 16e vs iPhone 16: Performance and Screen
The screens of both smartphones are very similar: the iPhone 16 has a resolution of 2,556 x 1,179 pixels, while the 16e has a resolution of 2,532 x 1,170 pixels.
Regarding performance, both have 8 GB of RAM and use the same processor, the A18 Bionic. However, the GPU (responsible for graphics processing) of the 16e has only 4 cores and slightly lower performance than its older brother, which has a 5-core GPU.
One aspect in which the iPhone 16e has an advantage is the battery, which has 3,961 mAh, compared to 3,561 mAh of the 16 — the difference may result in a slightly longer battery life for the model released this year.
iPhone 16e vs iPhone 16: Which one is worth it?
For those who want to save money and don’t care about features like the dedicated photo button and wireless charging, the iPhone 16e is worth it. But if you’re looking for the full iOS experience, it might be worth paying a little more for the iPhone 16.
